INTRODUCTION
Dry socket, also termed alveolar osteitis is a well recognised complication of tooth extraction. It is characterised by increasingly severe pain in and around the extraction site, usually starting on the second or third post-operative day and which may last for between ten and forty days. The pain may radiate and typically pain in the ear is one of the symptoms of a dry socket in the mandible. The normal post-extraction blood clot is absent from the tooth socket(s), the bony walls of which are denuded and exquisitely sensitive to even gentle probing. Halitosis is invariably present. The condition probably arises as a result of a complex interaction between surgical trauma, local bacterial infection and various systemic factors.
There is great variation in reported incidence rates (1%-65%) between series usually due to inconsistency in diagnostic criteria, variation in microbial prophylaxis and study sample heterogeneity. The true incidence rate probably lies somewhere between 3% and 20% of all extractions with lower pre-molar and molar sockets most commonly involved.
These guidelines are intended to assist in the prevention and management of the condition.
MANAGEMENT
1. RISK FACTORS
1.1 Extraction of mandibular rather than maxillary teeth.
1.2
Extraction of third molars especially impacted lower third molars.
1.3
Singleton extractions.
1.4 Traumatic and difficult
extractions.
1.5 Female sex especially if using oral
contraception.
1.6 Poor oral hygiene and plaque control.
1.7
Active or recent history of acute ulcerative gingivitis or pericoronitis
associated with the index tooth(teeth).
1.8 Smoking, especially if >
20 cigarettes per day.
1.9 Increased bone density either locally or
generally (eg Paget's disease and osteopetrosis).
1.10 Previous history
of dry sockets following extractions.
2. PREVENTIVE MEASURES
2.1 A comprehensive history with identification of risk factors.
2.2
Wherever possible pre-operative oral hygiene measures to reduce plaque levels to
a minimum should be instituted.
2.3 Where the clinical history and/or
radiographic examination suggests a particularly difficult extraction
consideration should be given to an elective trans-alveolar approach.
2.4
All extractions should be completed with the minimum amount of trauma, the
maximum amount of care and as rapidly as possible commensurate with the degree
of difficulty and experience of the operator. If the extraction is beyond the
capability of the clinician then the patient should be referred to an
appropriate capable clinician.
2.5 Avoid extracting lower third molars in
the presence of active infection or ulcerative gingivitis.
2.6 For
difficult lower third molar bony impactions, for immunocompromised patients and
for patients with a history of previous pericoronitis or ulcerative gingivitis,
appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered.
2.7 Patients
who smoke should be enjoined to cease the habit pre-operatively and for at least
two weeks post-operatively whilst the socket(s) heals.
2.8 Wherever
possible, for female patients using the oral contraceptive extractions should be
performed during days 23 through 28 of the tablet cycle.
2.9 Patients
should be advised to avoid vigorous mouth rinsing for the first 24 hours post
extraction and to use gentle tooth brushing and mouth rinses for 7 days
post-extraction.
2.10 Patients should be advised to return to the
surgery/hospital immediately if they develop increasing pain or
halitosis.
2.11 Pre- and post-operative verbal instructions should be
supplemented with written advice to ensure maximum compliance.
3. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
3.1 Severe and persistent pain arising 24 - 48 hours following tooth
extraction localised to the extraction socket(s) which is(are) sensitive to even
gentle probing. Typically the pain radiates to the ear with mandibular
lesions.
3.2 Absence of a normal healthy post-extraction blood clot in
the socket(s) which may be empty or contain fragments of disintegrating blood
clot.
3.3 Halitosis.
3.4 Trismus.
4. TREATMENT
4.1 All patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of a possible dry socket
should be reviewed immediately by the operating clinician.
4.2 If
appropriate patients should be x-rayed to exclude the possibility of retained
fragments of tooth or foreign body.
4.3 The affected socket(s) should be
gently irrigated with 0.12% warmed chlorhexidine and all debris dislodged and
aspirated. In extremely painful cases local anaesthesia may be required and in
this instance regional nerve blocks should be employed wherever
possible.
4.4 The socket should be lightly packed with a dressing that
contains an obtundant for pain relief and a non-irritant antiseptic to inhibit
bacterial and fungal growth. The dressing should prevent the accumulation of
food debris and protect the exposed bone from local irritation. Ideally the
dressing should resorb and should not excite a host inflammatory or foreign body
response.
4.5 Appropriate analgesics should be prescribed. Members of the
Non Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Group of drugs are recommended provided there
are no individual medical contraindications for their use.
4.6 Patients'
progress should be reviewed the following day but they should be informed to
return sooner if problems worsen in the intervening period. Admission to
hospital is rarely required.
4.7 Steps 4.3 and 4.4 should be repeated as
frequently as necessary to keep the patient comfortable and pain free. Analgesic
efficacy should be reviewed and analgesic regimes altered appropriately. When it
is considered that socket dressings are no longer required the patient can be
instructed in home socket irrigation techniques using an appropriate appliance
and 0.12% chlorhexidine.
4.8 Patients should be kept under review until
they are pain free and socket healing is ensured.
REFERENCES
Aaratunga NA, Senaratne CM. A clinical study of dry socket in Sri Lanka. [Review] BJOMS. 1988;26
Birn H. Aetilogy and pathogenesis of fibrinolytic alveolitis ("Dry Socket") IJOS. 1973;2
Catellani JE. Review of factors contributing to dry socket through enhanced fibrinolysis. [Review] JOS. 1979;37
Catallani JE, Harvey S, Erickson SH, Cherkin D. Effect of oral contraceptive cycle on dry socket (localised alveolar osteitis). Journal of the American Dental Association. 1980;101
Chapnick P, Diamond LH. A review of dry socket: a double blind study on the effectiveness of clindamycin in reducing the incidence of dry socket [see comments]. [Review] Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 1992;58
Fazakerley M Field EA. Dry socket: a painful post-extraction complication (a review). [Review] Dental Update 1991;18
Garibaldi JA Greenlaw J, Choi J, Fotovatjah M. Treatment of post-operative pain. Journal of the California Dental Association. 1995;23
Killey HC, Sewrad JR, Kay LW. An outline of Oral Surgery, Part 1. Bristol: Wright, 1975: 124 - 127
Larsen PE. The effect of chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1991; 49
Loukota RA. The effect of pr-operative perioral skin preparation with aqueous povidone-iodine on the incidence of infection after third molar removal. BJOMS. 1991;29
Meechan JG, Macgregor ID, Rogers SN, Hobson RS, Bate JP, Dennison M. The effect of smoking on immediate post extraction socket filling with blood and on the incidence of painful socket. BJOMS. 1988; 26
Piecuch JF, Arzadon J, Lieblich SE. Prophylactic antibiotics for third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1995;53
Ragno JR, Szkutnik AJ. Evaluation of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of alveolar osteitis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1991;72
Trieger N, Schlagel GD. Preventing dry socket. A simple procedure that works. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1991; 122
Swanson AE. Prevention of dry socket: an overview. [Review] Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1990; 70